Re: Why the Blade Runner Voice Over Sucks

Johne Cook <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I think it comes down to trusting the audience to follow along, at least in
gist mode, with a complex story. Inception didn't need explanatory voiceover
to hold our hands - it was a good call to go back and resurrect the film
without the clunky voiceover. (Whether you think Ford sandbagged the
voiceovers as a mechanism to try to prompt the study in the right direction
or not, he does rather make the point self-evident - there is a place for
Noir voiceover ala Philip Marlowe but this wasn't it.)

Great find, Paul.

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |

*“I am not responsible for actions of the imaginary version of me you have
inside your head.”
Attributed to Teresa Nielsen Hayden*


On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, pcg <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been working my way through my new Blade Runner blu-ray set,
> re-watching all the extras for this stupendous, breathtaking film. I
> was reminded of the following, which most perfectly describes
> everything that's wrong with the ill-advised, tacked-on voice-overs:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_nsSxblpoI
>
> Gotta love Darabont for putting it bluntly.  :)
>
> --
> -pcg
>  [email protected]
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.