Re: Why the Blade Runner Voice Over Sucks
Johne Cook <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think it comes down to trusting the audience to follow along, at least in gist mode, with a complex story. Inception didn't need explanatory voiceover to hold our hands - it was a good call to go back and resurrect the film without the clunky voiceover. (Whether you think Ford sandbagged the voiceovers as a mechanism to try to prompt the study in the right direction or not, he does rather make the point self-evident - there is a place for Noir voiceover ala Philip Marlowe but this wasn't it.) Great find, Paul. Johne Cook | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com | *“I am not responsible for actions of the imaginary version of me you have inside your head.” Attributed to Teresa Nielsen Hayden* On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, pcg <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been working my way through my new Blade Runner blu-ray set, > re-watching all the extras for this stupendous, breathtaking film. I > was reminded of the following, which most perfectly describes > everything that's wrong with the ill-advised, tacked-on voice-overs: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_nsSxblpoI > > Gotta love Darabont for putting it bluntly. :) > > -- > -pcg > [email protected] > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot