Re: Why the Blade Runner Voice Over Sucks

"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <1F81502A86F445CF80ABF18F2F1BCAD1@MikePC>
Having now watched the movie without the voiceover I have come to appreciate 
it without the voice over.  It does make the film a much more visual 
experience, as there is nothing to take your mind off the scenery - the 
industrial landscape in particular.

That being said I'm not throwing out the voice over version entirely.  I 
still maintain that Harrison's voice was perfect, (whether he intended it or 
not), for the tone and feel of the movie.  The irony of the main character 
sounding so disinterested and deadpan brought home the bleak existence of 
life in the shadow of Tyrell Corp, where all you do is go through the 
motions.

Mike F.

-----Original Message----- 
From: pcg
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Why the Blade Runner Voice Over Sucks

> (Whether you think Ford sandbagged the
> voiceovers as a mechanism to try to prompt
> the study in the right direction or not, he does
> rather make the point self-evident - there is a place for
> Noir voiceover ala Philip Marlowe but this wasn't it.)

Have you checked out the extras on the deluxe edition? It's
fascinating to listen to Ford's voiceover recording sessions. He's
reading each line and then saying stuff like, "Are you serious? This
is crazy. This is.... well, whatever..."

-- 
-pcg
[email protected]

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot 


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.