Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sure, Pity her bustline was hardly sexualized. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:48 AM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History _____ > Perhaps. But if Obama's mother was the same age as the > girl in the ad, then obviously the applicability (or not) of a term > like "underage" would have to apply to both of them equally. >I feel like the question of "underage" (a subjective and ultimately sort of meaningless term) is less relevant than the issue itself, which is the superficial and senseless sexualization of marketing in what are, essentially, children's stories.< Exactly. That puts it much better than I did. Mike F. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot