Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History

Plenty, actually.
 
Let me also point out that we are not seeing the original photo(s), we are
seeing two different edits.  Only one site so far has admitted that they do not
know which is closer to the original.  The fact is that the larger one could
have been there first (the site says they saw it first) and then she could have
been reduced for the other.
 
Also, that site noted what I did, that they may have been from different photos
in the first place, as the hair was very different.  So this is huge fuss over
how much we do not know.
 
 
 
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:29 AM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History
 
WTF?  What other possible intent behind increasing her bust size could there be?

 
 
Mike F.  
 
  _____  

From: Karl <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 12:21:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History
Only when you assume that was the intent.
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:45 AM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History
 
Like I said to Karl, that they weren't as effective in sexualizing Emma Watson
as they could have been seems like a bizzare defense.
 
Mike F.  
 
  _____  

From: Peter T. Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 11:39:36 AM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Mike Findlay wrote:

> > > > > Was she my daughter?
> > > >
> > > > Was Emma Watson?  :)
> > >
> > > Did they enhance her bust?
> >
> > Irrelevant.  The question of "is she underage, or is she not underage" > is
not affected by what anyone may or may not have done to her bust.
> 
> Actually, the age of Obama's mother is irrelevant to the issue of sexualizaton
of young girls in advertisements for movies.

Perhaps.  But if Obama's mother was the same age as the girl in the ad, then
obviously the applicability (or not) of a term like "underage" would have to
apply to both of them equally.

And Emma Watson wasn't *especially* sexualized.  I don't think anyone would have
looked at the touched-up ad and had particuarly sexual thoughts.  It's not like
they went all Jayne Mansfield on her.

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot