Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History

> They slightly enhanced a 17-year-old girl's bust, yes.  You say they
> "sexualized" her.  I guess you'd have to clarify what you mean by that term;
> that would be part of how you mount your argument.

I realize you're responding specifically to Mike here, but for my
part, I'd like to point out that they're sexualizing the marketing of
the film, not Watson, per se. Obviously, as a female past puberty,
she's a sexual creature, and there's no reason to try to *hide* any
aspect of that or be ashamed of it.

The question becomes whether it's ok to sexualize her image (a) in a
way that unnecessarily exceeds her natural form, (b) in the marketing
of a film primarily targeted at children, and (c) in a way that would
cause me to be disappointed if I ever found myself in an intimate
situation with Ms. Watson.

-- 
-pcg
 [email protected]

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot