Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Does that image exceed her natural form? http://images.tvrage.com/people_galleries/20/59035/88160.jpg Not really, that second image is fairly true to her. They did not enhance it hugely, which no one seems to want to admit. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pcg Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 12:17 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History > They slightly enhanced a 17-year-old girl's bust, yes. You say they > "sexualized" her. I guess you'd have to clarify what you mean by that > term; that would be part of how you mount your argument. I realize you're responding specifically to Mike here, but for my part, I'd like to point out that they're sexualizing the marketing of the film, not Watson, per se. Obviously, as a female past puberty, she's a sexual creature, and there's no reason to try to *hide* any aspect of that or be ashamed of it. The question becomes whether it's ok to sexualize her image (a) in a way that unnecessarily exceeds her natural form, (b) in the marketing of a film primarily targeted at children, and (c) in a way that would cause me to be disappointed if I ever found myself in an intimate situation with Ms. Watson. -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot