Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, pcg wrote:
> The question becomes whether it's ok to sexualize her image (a) in a way 
> that unnecessarily exceeds her natural form . . .

Which would be an odd question to ask with respect to a *fantasy* film, in 
which she plays a girl with powers beyond those of mere muggles. :)

> . . . (b) in the marketing of a film primarily targeted at children . .  .

Was it?  The film was rated PG-13, not PG.  And the 10-year-old kids who 
bought the first Harry Potter book when it was brand new would have been 
20 when the film came out.  (Or, alternatively, the 10-year-olds who saw 
the first film when it was new would have been 16 when this film came 
out.  And then there is Harry's rather large adult fanbase.)

> . . . and (c) in a way that would cause me to be disappointed if I ever 
> found myself in an intimate situation with Ms. Watson.

Ha!  :)

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot