Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The question becomes whether it's ok to sexualize her image (a) in a way that >unnecessarily exceeds her natural form . . . >Which would be an odd question to ask with respect to a *fantasy* film, in which >she plays a girl with powers beyond those of mere muggles. :)< So the enhanced bust was part of her super powers? MIke F. > . . . (b) in the marketing of a film primarily targeted at children . . . Was it? The film was rated PG-13, not PG. And the 10-year-old kids who bought the first Harry Potter book when it was brand new would have been 20 when the film came out. (Or, alternatively, the 10-year-olds who saw the first film when it was new would have been 16 when this film came out. And then there is Harry's rather large adult fanbase.) > . . . and (c) in a way that would cause me to be disappointed if I ever found >myself in an intimate situation with Ms. Watson. Ha! :) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot