Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0CF0A5C0B8ED48FF93993BE02B8AE939@MikePC> |
FWIW, when I looked at both images I thought a case could be made that there wasn’t much of an edit at all. But the page we first were looking at indicated that the studio, (IIRC), pulled the poster and said they didn’t create it. To their credit they didn’t even want anyone thinking it had been altered. That notwithstanding, my argument all along has been to the propriety/appropriateness of making such an edit. I’m relatively confident that Emma Watson is “hot” enough for 14 year old boys and adult perverts to wank to, and to make her even “hotter” by editing her picture strikes me as the epitome of sleaze. Mike F. From: Karl Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 5:39 PM To: 'DADL (off topic)' Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Photo Tampering Throughout History I hate to say this but the more I look at it the more I question which one is the actual edit. The line of the smaller image is too sharp on her torso, it looks cropped. We are comparing two composite image edits and wondering which came first. They likely took individual images and layered them in the first place, so god knows what they modified on her part in the first place. This whole debate is a waste of time since no one has found the original raw images to see what they started with. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot