Re: Photo Tampering Throughout History

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Mike Findlay wrote:
> I don't think I can rule things out of by invoking the word.  But I'm 
> really not interested in the much broader discussion/argument about 
> defining what a child is, at the moment.

Well you *should* be, if you're going to throw around words like "child" 
and "underage" and so on and so forth.  You can't defend your use of one 
word by using another word in a way that means the same basic thing.

> And your making an issue of it, at this point in the discussion, seems 
> like it is more baiting than anything else.

I just don't like it when people throw around accusations based on 
erroneous assumptions.

> Thankfully, you're not the final arbiter of whether that means I get to 
> participate in the thread.

True, I do not moderate DADL-OT.  Someone else does that.  (And he does a 
good job, too! :) )

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot