Re: Free Speech No Defense for Urging Suicide
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've never argued the guy wasn't, in fact, convicted. Mike F. ________________________________ From: Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, March 16, 2011 2:01:17 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Free Speech No Defense for Urging Suicide On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> wrote: With the exception of yelling fire in a crowded theater I'm pretty sure it is. If you have an example please share it, because I'm drawing a blank at the moment. Well, the article said: "Melchert-Dinkel was not merely expressing ideas about suicide The court finds that defendant's speech imminently incited the victims to commit suicide, and can be described as 'lethal advocacy,' which is analogous to the category of unprotected speech known as 'fighting words' and 'imminent incitement of lawlessness,'" Neuville wrote. So incitement to violence and "incitement of lawlessness" do not appear to be protected. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot