Re: Constitutional Problems with the Libyan War
Johne Cook <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I couldn't care less what Ron Paul thinks about foreign policy. Johne Cook | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |* * On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:47 PM, david white <[email protected]> wrote: > http://paul.house.gov/index.php? > option=com_content&view=article&id=1840:constitutional-problems-with-the- > libyan-war-&catid=62:texas-straight-talk&Itemid=69 > > Constitutional Problems with the Libyan War > > Last week the Obama Administration took the United States to war against > Libya without bothering to notify Congress, much less obtain a > Constitutionally-mandated declaration of war. In the midst of our severe > economic downturn, this misadventure has already cost us hundreds of > millions > of dollars and we can be sure the final price tag will be several times > higher. > > Why did the US intervene in a civil war in a country that has neither > attacked us nor poses a threat? We are told this was another humanitarian > intervention, like Clinton’s 1999 war against Serbia. But as civilian > victims > of the US-led coalition bombing continue to add up, it is getting difficult > to determine whether the problem we are creating on the ground is worse > than > the one we were trying to solve. > > Though the administration seems to be playing with semantics, calling this > a “kinetic military action,” let’s be clear: this is a US act of war on > Libya. Imposing a no-fly zone over the air space of a sovereign nation is > an > act of war, as Secretary of Defense Robert Gates pointed out before the > bombing began. That the administration hesitates to call this war, > possibly > due to the troubling Constitutional implications, does not mean that it is > not one. Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution could not be clearer: the > power and obligation to declare war resides solely in the US Congress. > > There was ample time and opportunity for the administration to consult the > UN, NATO and the Arab League before going to war, but not the US Congress. > > Aside from the manner in which the administration took us to war, it is > also > troubling that our government has taken a decisive stand for one side of an > internal conflict in another sovereign country. The administration speaks > out of both sides of its mouth on this, claiming that the US is not > attempting to overthrow the Gaddafi regime while clearly benefitting the > rebels and stating that Gaddafi must leave. Does this make any sense? > Gaddafi > may well be every bit the “bad guy” we are told he is, but who are the > rebels > we are assisting? Do we have any clue? Will they bring freedom and > prosperity to Libya if they are victorious? We might like to hope so, but > the fact is, we don’t know. Michael Scheuer, former head of the CIA’s Bin > Laden unit, explained in a recent article that there is plausible reason to > believe the rebels are current or former Islamist mujahedin, eager to > engage > in jihad. Indeed, Gaddafi has fought against Libyan Islamists for years > and > is seen by them as a bitter enemy. Astoundingly, it may well be that we > are > assisting al Qaeda in this new war! > > The costs of this terrible mistake cannot be ignored. Congress has been > locked in battles over budget cuts and agonizing over ways to save money. > Recent proposed spending cuts have by now been completely wiped out with > this > new war! Will we be rebuilding Libya ten years from now? Will Congress > simply roll over and rubber stamp more emergency spending bills for this > new > war as they have done in the past? We must end our participation in any > attack on Libya immediately and I have signed on to legislation that would > do > exactly that. Congress must assert its Constitutional authority and rein in > an administration clearly out of control. > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot