Re: Wish I'd thought of this one.

Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sorry, but no.  That is revisionist history.  The aims were perfectly clear in 
Iraq when we went in.  What to do after we toppled Saddam may not have been as 
well thought out but there was no question as to what we were going in to do.  


There is nothing clear about whether we are getting Qaddafi out.

Mike F.    




________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, April 1, 2011 10:23:39 AM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Wish I'd thought of this one.

>those who object to the conflict only because Obama hasn't got a clue what his 
>aims are, how >to achieve them, or how to explain them to the public. 

 
I would also note that when this criticism was brought up regarding the invasion 
of Iraq, many of these same people didn't see the absence of a clear objective 
all that of a big problem.  Currently, the aims are about the same... get the 
guy out if we can.


Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.