Re: The debates mess (2) -- Harper v Ignatieff?

"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Bruce Geerdes wrote:

>>>> The next prime minister will be, let’s face it, either Stephen Harper 
>>>> or Michael Ignatieff. Surely the debates should be a one-on-one 
>>>> affair.
>>>
>>> Just like the Americans do it! ;)
>>
>> I can't remember, did Perot take part in the debates in '92 or '96?
>
> I'm thinking '92, spoiling the election for GHW Bush.

So he took part in '92, but not in '96?  I have a vague recollection that 
he ran for president both times, and that Clinton, as a result, won the 
presidency but never had a clear majority of the popular vote.  (If memory 
serves, Bush's re-election in '04 marked the first time that someone had 
won more than 50% of the vote since his dad won the election in '88.)

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.