Re: The debates mess (2) -- Harper v Ignatieff?
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Bruce Geerdes wrote: >>>> The next prime minister will be, lets face it, either Stephen Harper >>>> or Michael Ignatieff. Surely the debates should be a one-on-one >>>> affair. >>> >>> Just like the Americans do it! ;) >> >> I can't remember, did Perot take part in the debates in '92 or '96? > > I'm thinking '92, spoiling the election for GHW Bush. So he took part in '92, but not in '96? I have a vague recollection that he ran for president both times, and that Clinton, as a result, won the presidency but never had a clear majority of the popular vote. (If memory serves, Bush's re-election in '04 marked the first time that someone had won more than 50% of the vote since his dad won the election in '88.) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot