Re: The debates mess (2) -- Harper v Ignatieff?
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > He may have run in 96, but don't recall him being nearly as much of a > factor. FWIW, Wikipedia indicates that Perot got 18.9% of the vote in 1992 and 8.4% in 1996. Clinton, meanwhile, got 43.0% in 1992 and 49.2% in 1996. And Bush got 37.5% in 1992, while Dole got 40.7% in 1996. So, at a glance, this would seem to indicate that 0.6% of the vote went to someone *other* than Bush or Clinton or Perot in 1992, while 1.7% went to someone other than Dole or Clinton or Perot in 1996. Also, it would seem that there was an 8.5 percentage-point gap between Clinton and Dole in 1996, which was a considerable improvement on the 5.5 percentage-point gap between Clinton and Bush in 1992. > And wasn't there a candidate on the left that pulled votes from Clinton > and was part of him only getting a plurality again. Was it Nader? Nader apparently got only 0.7% of the vote in 1996. Meanwhile, Harry Browne got 0.5%, and a couple other guys got between 0.1% and 0.2%. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992 https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1996 -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot