Re: The debates mess (2) -- Harper v Ignatieff?

"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Mike Findlay wrote:
> He may have run in 96, but don't recall him being nearly as much of a 
> factor.

FWIW, Wikipedia indicates that Perot got 18.9% of the vote in 1992 and 
8.4% in 1996.

Clinton, meanwhile, got 43.0% in 1992 and 49.2% in 1996.

And Bush got 37.5% in 1992, while Dole got 40.7% in 1996.

So, at a glance, this would seem to indicate that 0.6% of the vote went to 
someone *other* than Bush or Clinton or Perot in 1992, while 1.7% went to 
someone other than Dole or Clinton or Perot in 1996.

Also, it would seem that there was an 8.5 percentage-point gap between 
Clinton and Dole in 1996, which was a considerable improvement on the 5.5 
percentage-point gap between Clinton and Bush in 1992.

> And wasn't there a candidate on the left that pulled votes from Clinton 
> and was part of him only getting a plurality again.  Was it Nader?

Nader apparently got only 0.7% of the vote in 1996.  Meanwhile, Harry 
Browne got 0.5%, and a couple other guys got between 0.1% and 0.2%.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1996

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.