Re: tomorrow marks the 50th anniversary of the first human spaceflight

Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
We haven't.  Nine sounded high to me and I checked we've only been six times.  
If Wiki is to be believed, (and it looks right)there were ten planned missions 
but one didn't make it, (Apollo 13), and a three were canceled for budget 
reasons.

We've orbited the moon 10 times, but I don't think of those as trips "to the 
moon".

Mike F.  

 




________________________________
From: Johne Cook <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 4:34:04 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] tomorrow marks the 50th anniversary of the first human 
spaceflight

I don't think I knew we'd been to the moon nine times...

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |




On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Peter T. Chattaway<petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> 
wrote:

http://www.straight.com/article-386136/vancouver/yuri-gagarin-anniversary-marks-50-years-human-spaceflight

>
>Yuri Gagarin anniversary marks 50 years of human spaceflight
>
>By Doug Sarti, April 11, 2011
>
>Fifty years ago this week, 27-year-old Soviet Air Force pilot Yuri Alekseyvich 
>Gagarin exclaimed "Poyekhali!" ("Off we go!") and blasted off from the Russian 
>steppes to become the first human in space.
>
>A triumph of engineering, his April 12, 1961, flight was also a triumph of Cold 
>War politics for the Soviet Union.
>
>When Gagarin's spacecraft, the cramped Vostok3A, roared into orbit, it was the 
>culmination of a fierce four-year competition between the Soviets and the United 
>States to see who could get a man into space soonest.
>
>It was pretty much a dead heat, with the first American, Alan Shepard, 
>originally slated to fly in early March of 1961. When technical difficulties 
>sidelined Shepard's flight for two months, Gagarin had his chance to make 
>history.
>
>With their heavy-lift Vostok rockets, the Soviets had a decided advantage in the 
>early days of spaceflight. Their missions displayed a dazzling number of 
>"firsts": First satellite, first animal in space (a dog named Laika), first man 
>in space, and before long, the first woman and first multi-person crew in space, 
>as well as the first spacewalk.
>
>In 1961, Soviet rockets could fly higher, longer, and carry larger payloads than 
>contemporary American rockets. In fact, when Shepard finally did launch, nearly 
>a month after Gagarin, it was a somewhat anticlimactic suborbital mission -- a 
>simple up-and-down ballistic flight. Still, it didn't stop the American PR 
>machine from billing Shepard as "The First Free Man in Space".
>
>At the time, Gagarin's 108-minute flight -- like much of the inner workings the 
>Soviet Union -- was veiled in secrecy and the mission wasn't even announced 
>until Gagarin had returned safely. While the flight went smoothly, there was one 
>major cover-up which didn't come to light until later: the fact that Gagarin had 
>bailed out after re-entering Earth's atmosphere.
>
>While early American spacecraft were designed to semi-gently splash down on the 
>ocean, the Vostoks were constructed for harder landings on the grasslands of 
>Western Russia. Since Soviet engineers were still working the kinks out of their 
>retro-rocket braking system, it was decided that it would be safer to have 
>Gagarin eject at 20,000 feet and parachute back to Earth.
>
>A reasonable plan, but one at odds with the regulations of the 
>FdrationAronautique Internationale -- the global organization overseeing 
>aviation achievements -- which stipulated that a pilot must land his craft to 
>qualify for a record. Thus, the story was concocted, and perpetuated, that 
>Gagarin remained in the Vostok throughout the entire landing.
>
>Regardless, once Gagarin was back on terrafirma and the story broke, the world 
>was electrified. And, aside from the tremendous achievement itself, it was 
>obvious the Soviets had once again bested the American space program.
>
>The perceived loss of national pride was even enough to spur America on to the 
>moon. Angling for a space achievement where the U.S. could be first, U.S. 
>president John F. Kennedy declared, little more than a month after Gagarin's 
>flight, "I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, 
>before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely 
>to the Earth."
>
>For his bravery, Gagarin was awarded his nation's highest medal, Hero of the 
>Soviet Union. He remained in the Soviet Air Force, went to engineering school, 
>and continued working for the space program, although he was taken out of the 
>flight rotation. A hero of Gagarin's magnitude, the Soviet leadership felt, was 
>too valuable to risk in the dangerous business of spaceflight.
>
>Tragically, even the Politburo couldn't keep Gagarin safe from occupational 
>hazards. In 1968, while on a routine training mission, Gagarin was killed when 
>he lost control of his MiG 15 and crashed in western Russia. While a stunned 
>nation mourned, he was given a state funeral and his ashes were interred in the 
>walls of the Kremlin.
>
>Today, when spaceflight is perceived as routine.boring, even -- the anniversary 
>of Gagarin's historic mission reminds us that it wasn't always so. As the United 
>States and the Soviet Union grappled for a foothold in the heavens, it was a 
>contest of not only national pride, but political ideology.
>
>It's also a reminder of the difficulty, expense, and danger inherent in space 
>travel. Except for nine quick trips to the moon, humans haven't strayed from the 
>same close Earth orbit that Gagarin trailblazed a half-century ago.
>
>-- 
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.