Re: Why Obama should pay more in taxes
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > I suppose it would depend on the flat rate you establish. But any > taxation based on income is a form of extortion. I know that is whacko > talk but the idea that your labor, at least a portion of it, is > repugnant, to me at least. I wouldn't call it wacko talk if the tax in question is less than a century old. There might even be people alive today who can still remember a time before income tax, I dunno. Of course, they could probably also remember a time before women got the vote, but there you go. You win some, you lose some. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot