Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...

On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Karl Swenson wrote:
> Uh no, if he needs to be born on US soil *and* have a US parent, his 
> birth certificate becomes essential to the claim.

Gah, you're right.  Don't know what I was thinking.

> However the US citizen parent is a non starter.  Any child born on US 
> soil is an American citizen.  That's the crux of the whole anchor baby 
> debate.

Well, yeah.  But would the anchor babies be considered "natural-born" 
citizens in the sense that the Constitution specifies here?

BTW, speaking of anchor babies, Steve Sailer recently posted an English 
translation of a brochure produced by a company called Chinese Baby Care, 
which explains all the reasons why women might want to travel to the 
United States just to give birth there:

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/04/birth-tourism-explained-in-actual.html
http://www.chinesebabycare.com/

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot