Re: The case for hell
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Assuming that is true for the sake of argument. How/why is fundamentalists reacting predictably to what they perceive as heresy considered news? Oh wait, it confirms peoples preconceived notions that Christians are all intolerant boobs gleefully rubbing there hands at the thought of others going to hell. Stop the presses! Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Mike F. ________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, April 25, 2011 1:07:18 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] The case for hell >The "pro-hell faction" may not even have noticed Bell's book if it hadn't been >treated like >something revolutionary by the "lamestream" media, (yeah its a >hokey label but it sure fits in >this instance). Actually, it was the "pro-hell" faction that made it news...nobody was really talking about the book until they went nuts calling him a heretic and a Universalist. Had nobody taken on to denouncing him, I doubt it would have made any news, the book would not be a top seller on Amazon, etc. Thom http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade http://www.in-one-ear.com _______________________________________ "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot