Re: DOMA
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As Mike said: "Even if Clement is still on the case, (which I'm not sure about), the difference between the resources of a firm and a single lawyer are vast. " Exactly. Plus it gives the impression that he is just a 'crank' out of step with his peers, and is pursuing his own agenda, which also undercuts the legitimacy. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] DOMA >Are they though? If law firms are shown to be afraid to defend it, can we honestly know >that those who do are doing so with full and honest effort? >I think that is the appearance that concerns people. But that is why the guy (the one Althouse praised a week or so back) resigned from them and will continue to defend DOMA. His public resignation suggests he will give a full defense. Thom http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade http://www.in-one-ear.com _______________________________________ "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot