Re: DOMA
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Oh heck, no wonder. The link is from a gay and lesbian advocacy magazine. That explains the bias. I am sure that had they interviewed anyone in support of King and Spalding it would have been omitted. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] DOMA If you are in a firm knowledge about a case is imputed to you, even if you aren't working on it directly. If knowledge is imputed to you you are bound by the attorney client privileged. It would be very similar to a lawyer in a firm commenting that he thought another lawyer's (in the firm), client was guilty of a crime. That would be unethical, a violation of attorney client privilege and/or confidentiality and just plain bad form. I was referring to this: http://www.metroweekly.com/news/?ak=6167 Which some suggest could be illegal in some states. Thom http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade http://www.in-one-ear.com _______________________________________ "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot