Re: Trump's next rented mule

"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
One of the answers most dismissed was that Hallyburton actually was one of
only a few companies to do the task assigned and was a logical choice for
the choice.

 

Oh, and even factcheck gave this a look see..and determined it was bs.

 

http://www.factcheck.org/kerry_ad_falsely_accuses_cheney_on_halliburton.html

 

Now, could it be a quid pro quo thing?  I suppose, but so far there has been
nothing so show he influenced the selection of Hallyburton.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Trump's next rented mule

 

**yes it was fair.  And once it was shown he did not personally benefit, it
was fair to shush them.

 

Actually, one of the questions was: Are they benefiting from him?  He had
already gotten a million dollar paycheck as "thanks" when he left
Haliburton.  And then they get a major chunk of the contracts for Iraq?

Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.