Re: Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:06 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > This was over his insulting the gay community with derogatory comments and > opposing their freedom in FAVOR of his religious beliefs. > Yeah, everyone has their excuses for becoming uncivil. What they did was not worse than his lumping gays in with child molesters > and bestiality. > And don't forget polygamists. Or have they become "mainstream" enough that we don't group them with pedophiles any more? When changing what we consider the sexual norm, I think it's fair game to ask if we're moving the line now, where does it stop? Seriously. There are people that advocate consensual relationships with children. There are people that believe bestiality isn't hurting anyone. What is our criteria if it isn't the traditional married man & woman? And what keeps us from further expanding the norm in the future? Not that I want to argue this issue, but one can't even bring it up? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot