Re: Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, if we look at marriage as a sort of "anything goes", whatever an > individual wants to do, without considering societal ramifications. > > **well, you must admit there is much more biblical precedent for it.... > More than gay marriage? Sure. But that doesn't make it right. ***Doesn't make it wrong either. I have always wondered where the change happened and why (between the OT and NT) > ...I mean, it a form of traditional marriage world wide and has > > precedent in history. > > I think there is a reason western civilization moved beyond it. > > **we also moved past a lot of things that we are not better for. > Progress is not always good. And in this case? **I see it as a passive. I can see a lot of social benefit to lural marriage and a lot of potential harm. Face, it traditional marriage isn't such a pretty thing anymore is it? As you say, western civilization has apparently moved past it. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot