Re: Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > **well, you must admit there is much more biblical precedent for it.... > > More than gay marriage? Sure. But that doesn't make it right. > > ***Doesn't make it wrong either. I have always wondered where the change > happened and why (between the OT and NT) > Early OT was monogamous. And in this case? > > **I see it as a passive. I can see a lot of social benefit to lural > marriage and a lot of potential harm. What's the benefit? > Face, it traditional marriage isn't > such a pretty thing anymore is it? It is when it hasn't devolved into serial polygamy. > As you say, western civilization has > apparently moved past it. To its detriment. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot