Re: Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Polygyny was widely used in the bible and all over the world as well. Polyandry existed in Asia. (I also know at least two women who have been in polyandry relationships. According to both of them, it is not as uncommon as I thought). Group marriages or polyamory have actually existed in the US, just not legally, but they also existed in the pacific as well as Asia. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 1:05 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing Ignoring that that wasn't even remotely close to an answer of my question - How many polygamous societies have there been like either of those? Mike F. ________________________________ From: Karl Swenson <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 2:56:32 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing Because you assume that polygamy is only defined as one man many women. In reality it can be multiple couples or a woman with a stable of men. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 12:54 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing What are the theoretical positives of polygamy for women or children? What are the real, moral, (as opposed to getyourrocksoffwithmorethanonewoman), positives for men? Mike F. ________________________________ From: Karl Swenson <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 2:49:07 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Were any of you aware of the Santorum google thing > >Sure, if we look at marriage as a sort of "anything goes", whatever > >an individual wants to do, without considering societal ramifications. > Have we proven polygamy has negative societal ramifications? My gut > reaction is that is problematic... but should laws be based in "gut > reactions"? > Not yours. ;) Look up polygamy and the "problematic" aspects of it regarding women and children. ***obviously. And you ignore the theoretical positives why? > >I think there is a reason western civilization moved beyond it. > Besides religious reasons... this is? I think one of the reasons western civilization has succeeded is the family unit of a married couple and their children. Anything divergent from that and you're asking for trouble. This has been confirmed by studies regarding divorces, mothers with live-in boyfriends, single mothers -- all of these have a negative effect on children and, by extension, society. **I tend to agree. However since we do not study plural marriages we really cannot say how they fare can we? And also as I noted, not all traditional marriages are successful. In all cases the maturity of the people have a lot to do with it. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot