Re: This is what scares me more than anything

Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the general sense of not discouraging oil consumption, yeah.
>
> *** Because the proposal has nothing to do with consumption, it has to do
> with a crumbling infrastructure that *all* vehicles contribute to.

But if we're going to fund that some way, I like the way that
encourages conservation. So sue me.

> Given our lack of alternatives, yeah.
>
> ***As noted there are plenty of alternatives actually.

Plenty of alternatives that are less palatable.

>> (after noting that they don't work, ironically).
>
> Wha?
>
> " Actually, electric & hybrid vehicles are one reason a simple gas tax
> doesn't work. Revenues going down. :("
>
> ***so the answer is to increase what doesn't work, thus further lowering
> revenues and starting the cycle all over again?

It's a start. It's what I'd do right now, once my pre-conditions are met. :)

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.