Re: The Tragedy of Sarah Palin
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > But is he referring to the Charles Gibson one with the Bush Doctrine > question? No one knew the answer to that and it turned out Gibson > didn't even know it - there was no formulated Bush Doctrine and > different people described it different ways. Ah, but did Palin know that no one knew? No. And when Gibson *did* offer a definition, Palin's response betrayed her ignorance, too. I'm not even sure that her response made sense in relation to what Gibson actually said. > This is a classic example of how the media created a false narrative in > an all out effort to destroy her. I have a hard time blaming anyone for > not being ready to deal with the savagery brought to bear on her by the > media. I do, however, have a problem with someone who isn't ready for the job actually *taking* the job in the first place. > However, I am struck by Limbaugh's maxim to the effect of: the extent to > which the left/media attack someone is a reflection of their fear of > that person. I think their primary fear here -- at first -- was that Palin would siphon female voters away from Obama, who had just defeated Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries. I don't think they knew her well enough to fear her for other reasons yet ... though they certainly did eventually! -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot