Re: The Tragedy of Sarah Palin
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Karl Swenson wrote: >>> But is he referring to the Charles Gibson one with the Bush Doctrine >>> question? No one knew the answer to that and it turned out Gibson >>> didn't even know it - there was no formulated Bush Doctrine and >>> different people described it different ways. >> >> Ah, but did Palin know that no one knew? No. >> >> And when Gibson *did* offer a definition, Palin's response betrayed her >> ignorance, too. I'm not even sure that her response made sense in >> relation to what Gibson actually said. > > **Id have to replay it As I recall, Palin made significant use of the word "imminent" in her response. But as we all know, kind of the whole *point* of the Bush doctrine -- however we define it -- is that Bush didn't sit around waiting for threats to become "imminent". So Palin's answer was a non-answer. >>> This is a classic example of how the media created a false narrative >>> in an all out effort to destroy her. I have a hard time blaming >>> anyone for not being ready to deal with the savagery brought to bear >>> on her by the media. >> >> I do, however, have a problem with someone who isn't ready for the job >> actually *taking* the job in the first place. > > ***like Obama? Heck, even Biden has turned into an embarrassment. Biden, at least, is ready to deal with the savagery. Obama, though, I grant you, might not be. >>> However, I am struck by Limbaugh's maxim to the effect of: the extent >>> to which the left/media attack someone is a reflection of their fear >>> of that person. >> >> I think their primary fear here -- at first -- was that Palin would >> siphon female voters away from Obama, who had just defeated Hillary >> Clinton in the Democratic primaries. > > ***of course, and I expect that McCain was hoping for a bump there as > well. If memory serves, he even *got* a bump there, at first. (But not a baby bump. Don't want to encourage any more birthers or Trig truthers.) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot