Re: The Tragedy of Sarah Palin
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No, I was talking about both and responded to Karl based on his post. I brought up both Couric and Gibson in the first place. You can look it up. ; - ) Or are you defending Palin by pointing out how it is possible for someone to misunderstand a question even though it was put in writing, within context, and there was plenty of time to review/think about it. Mike F. ________________________________ From: Peter T. Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 4:13:53 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] The Tragedy of Sarah Palin On Thu, 12 May 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > Yeah, I was talking about the "what do you read" question. Oh, you were talking about Couric? I wasn't aware that anyone was talking about her; I thought Karl and I were talking about Gibson. But Palin's answer to the "what do you read" question *also* came across as more than a little dippy. Didn't help her one bit. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot