Farewell to the 4th amendment
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To depressing to elaborate upon. The only consolation is that the Kentucky Supreme Court could rule that the mere sound of movement behind the closed door of a home does not create exigent circumstances. If they had done that in the first place this case might not have been granted certiorari. As it is now, if the police mistakenly show up at your door and hear you moving about inside after they knock and announce themselves, they are entitled to presume that you are destroying evidence and break down the door and search your home. If interested note the language with which Alito talks about contact with the police - it is so unbelievably out of touch with the experience of the people the 4th Amendment is designed to protect. It would be laughable, but for the seriousness of the erosion of the 4th Amendment. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-1272.ZS.html -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot