Re: THE DEMS ARE OUT OF GAS, AND COAL, AND WOOD

On Tue, 17 May 2011, Karl Swenson wrote:
> Why 'unsatisfying'?

Because he appeals to, if you will, a sense of entitlement:

> He has come up with a plan that starts from a radical proposition: the 
> people are entitled to live their lives the way they do and it's time to 
> ensure the energy supply needed to support them.

He doesn't *quite* say that people are "entitled" to an energy supply, but 
he points in that direction, and to me that's kind of as absurd as saying 
that people are entitled to good weather, etc.

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot