Re: Magic Menstrual Mummies
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Well, challenge him on the specifics then. Don't just act all offended
> that he believes differently than you do, trying to get him to back
> down and apologize.
>
> **I didn't say anything of the sort. My only personalization was my
> saying that I felt his tone was arrogant since he implies that anyone
> not similarly enlightened as himself is ignorant.
No, I suggested there were 2 groups of evangelicals. 1.) The ignorant
- those who are uneducated to the knowledge or *ignore* the knowledge. and
2.) The educated leaders - who are knowledgeable enough to know, but for
whatever reason refused to teach us.
***Only two groups? Nice
Group 1.) has an excuse, group 2.) does not.
***Not by your standards. if Group 1 *ignores* the knowledge they are no
longer blameless, are they?
>> I am merely saying that just because he feels he was raised ignorant
>> does not mean *all* evangelicals are likewise ignorant
>
> Well, maybe it some people's opinion that they are. Not that *I* am
> arguing that necessarily, but honestly, it should make no difference
> to you.
>
> **he wasn't implying opinion, he was implying a factual ignorance of
> God and Christianity in general, not just of a sect.
Yes, you are correct, I was implying ignorance of God and Christianity in
general.
***and as such I think you have stepped beyond opinion to arrogance. Hubris
even. I think you do an unfair disservice to many evangelicals in the
process, something moderately unchristian.
> ***I am fine with that, but would you be ok with someone saying that a
> person born EO was born ignorant of the reality of Christ because of
> their
> hidebound and entrenched adherence to a false faith? I doubt it.
> That goes
> too far, and is insulting.
But true? Are you simply upset with the methods? The truth can be
insulting. ("That dress makes your butt look huge")
***Your version of truth, anyway.
>> I don't think any major
>> brand has it utterly right in that regard.
>
> Do you believe one "brand" is *more* right in any regard?
>
> **these days? No.
So then what is the criteria for choosing any brand then? Choose the least
insulting?
***each has their own criteria, we make our own choices. I at this point I
live in a more gray area as I cannot see why any particular sect is any
better than the others.
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot