Re: Magic Menstrual Mummies

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]>
wrote:
> you inserted yourself in a response I made to Lance, one in which I 
> also offered the possibility that I read it wrong.
> You have attacked me continually now for being too sensitive, and 
> sagely advise me to shut my pie hole, but you could have just sat back 
> and let Lance and I work it out.  Perhaps you are the sensitive one as
well?

No, I'm just getting tired of you reacting this way. "Are you saying I'm
ignorant?"

**which he did imply

 "Are you saying I'm not a believer?"

***which I admitted was out of context, though your response was
questionable.

 "Are you saying that you think you're better than I am?" 

***which he clearly does as he is so enlightened.

Discussions are great when the topic are facts or opinions but they get
*real* tiring when all they're about is you taking offense at someone's
"arrogance".

**get over it.  His tone was arrogant and offensive, I will not apologize
for seeing it as such particularly when he admits it.

> simply because I have
> no doctrinal preference should not be used to tell me I am not allowed 
> to challenge those that do when they do so to an extreme.

Your "doctrinal preference" (such as it is) has nothing to do with it.

***my point exactly.  So why tell me to back off?


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot