Re: Magic Menstrual Mummies
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Chattaway Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:45 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Magic Menstrual Mummies On Wed May 25 13:32:35 PDT 2011, Karl Swenson wrote: > I don't necessarily agree that simply because one church has differing > views about Jesus then he must a different one, but I think we may be > entering semantics here. When we say Jesus is God and the Muslims say no he isn't, I think we've moved beyond semantics. **Sure, the details matter. > Certainly when she and my Mormon uncles during prayer speak of a Jesus > that died on the cross, that was god's son and their savior, he sorta > sounds like the same fellow. Could be. I admit, based on what I've heard of their beliefs, their ideas about God the Father sound *way* more different than their ideas about Jesus... though I don't know whether they'd call him God the Son. (There's a difference between "God's son" and "God the Son", natch.) **yea, but I am unconvinced that that is substantive enough to concern me. Or is the trinity a deal breaker? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot