Re: Marine killed in his own home
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>***Calling them pigs is unwarranted. The cops doing the raid were doing what they were ordered to do, and being insulting is petty. This is a legal issue and they cops screwed up. But I have no problem pointing out that the victim contributed to his own demise, as much as I find it horrible.< I'm not calling cops in general pigs but these guys were pigs. When engaging in lawful conduct in one's home contributes to your demise and that demise is shot 60 times something is wrong. >***The number of shots is irrelevant.< No it isn't. It goes directly to the unjustified aspect of it and that these swine weren't acting as rational human beings but rather caught up in the cowboy moment of "let me get some". The last guy shooting blindly with his pistol into a darkened, (compared to the light outside), demonstratres that quite well >If police in the course of duty see a weapon pointed at them they are justified >in shooting.< They are justified in acting reasonably. They weren't acting reasonably. >The real determining factor is "was he pointing it at them" and unless we get >the helmet cams from the guy in the hallway we will never know. < We know that the gun was on safety. We know that the guy was a marine, (hmmm not so irrelevant now is it?). Its is reasonable to think that a trained marine, (back from Iraq IIRC), wouldn't be pointing a safety engaged weapon - that would be kind of pointless. And if the helmet cam, (assuming there was one), showed him pointing the gun don't you think it would have been released by the police? Add all that evidence up and I'd say you have pretty good circumstantial evidence that they guy wasn't pointing his gun at them. >***I disagree. The raids are not the problem when they are executed properly and legally. They are the problem when police use them irresponsibly. Had this been an Al Qaeda cell plotting a revenge bombing would you react differently? Details matter.< Are you kidding me? Militarized raids to execute drug raids aren't a problem? How many of these killings do we need to demonstrate unequivocally that these are a huge, easily avoided, problem? >http://reason.com/blog/2011/05/22/jose-guerena-evidence-dont-buy ***that article is useless as is a lot of the information since the police have sealed what they believed was their justification for the raid. You can speculate and accuse all you want but it is useless without that data. < They haven't sealed what they already said such as the press release. They may have sealed their attempts at a cover up or changing their story which this article is very useful in exposing. Mike F. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot