Re: Harper blocks mention of 1967 border in G8 Mideast statement

**the words "that stand" referring to "based on returning to Israel’s
pre-war 1967 borders, plus negotiated land swaps"
 .
The article quoted him accuratly and in the correct context you were
demanding (using the 67 borders a start point to negotiate land swaps).

>You are upset over nothing it seems to me.

well, you would be incorrect that I was "upset about nothing".  The 
correct comment would be that I clearly misunderstood or misread the 
sentences.

***uh, ok.  Since you were upset about what you misread, I justphrased it as such,

  And you are right...if I had gone back and double checked, 
I would seen what you have have pointed out.  I was wrong about the 
article.

***not like a number of pundits have not said what you thought the article did.  It was understandable.


>Does Israel reject that postition?  Yes, they want to start with what 
they
have no and negotiate back.  That is a seperate issue.

and, yet...there are polls showing that a majority of Isrealis side 
with Obama.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/25/us-israel-palestinians-idUSTRE74O2RB20110525?irpc=932

Which would make one wonder why the "Friends of Israel" are less 
supportive of the Presidents plan than the people of... You know... 
Israel.

***Kind of the way that we have Obama Care when the majority opposed it?  :)


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot