Re: Weiner's Twitter Tweak
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I don't recall saying that. Moore, as you and Peter noted, it much better at it, and I think he is worse because of it. Breitbart may be selecting stories to meet his agenda, I have no doubt he is. He will offer retractions, and he has corrected stories. I can't recall of any case where HE edited someone else to change the meaning of what he reports. The only close call was where he posted all of the video he got and it was . Andrew is a partisan reporter Moore is far worse as he hides his agenda in altruism and claims to be just a filmmaker. He falsely represents people with deliberate intentional editing and out of context shifting of events. His movies are scripted sculpted and planned to mislead. I cannot see how they are equals. Their mediums and tactics are completely different. All they share is being partisan. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 11:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Weiner's Twitter Tweak >Wow. I mean, wow... Why are you stunned that I see two people who willfully misuse information and manipulate facts in the same light? I find it more shocking that you think one is truly worse simply because he is not as good at it. Thom http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade http://www.in-one-ear.com _______________________________________ "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot