Re: Jilted exboyfriend's billboard free speech or invasion of privacy?
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> http://beta.news.yahoo.com/jilted-ex-boyfriend-puts-abortion-billboard-194142831.html > The woman's friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, > according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal. > > Holmes disputes that, saying his case is based on the accuracy of his > client's statement. > > "My argument is: What Fultz said is the truth," Holmes said. Well, abortions and miscarriages are the same thing, really. The question is whether it was spontaneous or induced. And if it was induced, then presumably there is a doctor out there who induced it. But I assume the doctor would be protected by some sort of patient confidentiality thing? > Jessen says her client's ex-boyfriend has crossed the line. > > "Nobody is stopping him from talking about father's rights. ... but a > person can't invade someone's private life." Hmmm. What if he had said this on a blog, rather than a billboard? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot