Re: LOTR on the Big Screen
Paul Christian Glenn <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:33:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've seen two: Avatar and Tron: Legacy. While I'm not a 3D evangelist ( and prefer to see most flicks in traditional 2D, and don't feel like IMAX is worth it unless it was *shot* in IMAX), both were excellent experiences. On Jun 12, 2011, at 7:27 PM, "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Richard Towry wrote: >> Well, considering the ticket prices for an IMAX-3D show these days, I'm very glad this is the last one! > > :) > > Y'know, I think the only IMAX 3D movie I've seen -- not counting the IMAX exclusive films, like the science documentaries and the like -- was the motion-capture Beowulf, which was shown to media on an IMAX screen. Virtually all of the other 3D press screenings I've attended have been on regular screens, using the REAL-D projectors and/or glasses. (And I'd have to drive at least half an hour to get to the nearest IMAX screen, so I've never really bothered. In fact, when I saw a recent documentary in IMAX 3D, I found that the 3D effect was lost quite easily if I tilted my head a certain way. So the regular 3D shows are enough for me.) > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot