Re: Just as I thought

Roger explains:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/06/_bam_margera_i_just_lost.html

Again, was what he actually said wrong? I don't think so. Insensitive,
perhaps, but my tolerance for drunk drivers is nil. If he was some average
Joe driving drunk, he was a jackass. If he was a celebrity driving drunk
whom many people genuinely liked, guess what? Still a jackass.

Ebert was perhaps crass for pointing out the truth, but that makes the truth
no less relevant. Sorry he's dead and that his passenger paid the ultimate
price for taking that ride with him. Still, he had a history of driving too
fast, and he'd been drinking before he left the bar. Roger's not a villain
in my book for commenting on that.

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |*
*


On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I saw that Ebert doubled down.
>
> Well, it seems that he meant it in the way I originally interpreted it.
>
> > He regrets if his tweet was taken as cruel.  Nothing more
> weaselly/assholish
> > than the non-apology apology.
>
> I'd think it more weaselly to offer an insincere apology. He stands by
> what he said, he's sorry people thought it cruel, he didn't mean it
> that way, what more can he say?
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot