Re: Just as I thought

Do you think his tweet was a comfort to Dunn's family or anyone else involved 
personally with the incident?   What possible purpose did the tweet serve, other 
than provide Ebert with the opportunity to spout off about what he personally 
thinks about the incident.  What value does that add?  Ebert in many of his 
posts/articles, especially those not involving movies, regularly claims the high 
moral ground from which he makes his pronouncements.  


And please spare me the "we are all guilty" silliness.  If we are going to 
consistently apply that methodology to our comments on this list we might as 
well shut it down.

Mike F.     




________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, June 22, 2011 8:32:23 AM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Just as I thought


>Timing is everything.  He was an asshole for tweeting that when he did; it 
>didn't and doesn't concern him and to stick his half a face, (I'm not wrong am 
I? He does have only half a face - granted it is a result of a terrible disease 
>- nonetheless it is true), in there the way he did was mean spitited.  Obviously 
>

>that's my opinion, but it coincides with the other impressions I have of him 
>-arrogant, narcissistic and narrow minded.



Are any of us on this list less guilty of those crimes?


Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot