Re: cars 2 vs. fast five ... which one do critics like more?
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, [email protected] wrote: >> Meanwhile, Fast Five -- the fifth installment of the Fast & Furious >> franchise, and also a >sequel that switches genre to some degree (Fast >> Five is a heist movie, unlike the first >four movies, while Cars 2 is a >> spy-movie spoof, unlike the original Cars) -- has a "fresh" >rating of >> 78% from "All Critics" and an even better 82% from "Top Critics". > > Um...heists were part the first Fast and the Furious film. In fact, > heists played a role in all the films (Street racing is the backdrop)... > so is Fast Five really that much of a departure? I must not be remembering the first four films all that well (well, I never saw the third film, but anyhoo). The fifth film was promoted quite heavily as a "heist" film a la Ocean's 11, so presumably something seemed different about it to *somebody*. Maybe the fact that they brought in a team that consisted of just about every supporting character from the first four films? Maybe the fact that they stole a *vault* this time? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot