Re: Just as I thought

"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:47:29 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <000c01cc3242$f84c92e0$e8e5b8a0$@com>
" If you mean that a person might celebrate Bin Laden's death because of
awful things he did, I would point out that he did nothing that our nation
hasn't also done."

Sorry, I really bored by that bit of sophistry.

And I will point out that I was one of the ones here troubled by peoples
"good" attitude and acceptance that our government essentially sent in a hit
squad who pretty obviously had no realistic intention of bringing him back
alive.

In this guys case, it is a tragic end but also one that should serve as a
lesson to others about being a community of concerned people.

I think Ebert came on too strong too soon, but he was correct in his
sentiment.  But being correct does not justify it.

But that's just me.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Paul Christian Glenn
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 10:15 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Just as I thought

If you mean that a person might celebrate Bin Laden's death because of awful
things he did, I would point out that he did nothing that our nation hasn't
also done. The only thing that ostensibly differentiates the acrions is the
reason for doing it, and that's direcrly tied to one's worldview.

Or, to simplify further, it wouldnt be incorrect to say that Bin Laden's
worldview was, partially, that he had a sacred obligation to kill infidels,
and that worldview led directly to his death, and the celebrations thereof. 

Unless, of course, Mike at some point expressed his hatred of Bin Laden's
beard or something. ;)



On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:52 PM, "Peter T. Chattaway"
<petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, pcg wrote:
> 
>>>> I've known you, in fact, to  take satisfaction in the deaths of others
whose worldviews did not jive with your own.
>>> 
>>> Name one. . . .
>> 
>> Quoting you from May 2:
>> 
>> "I'm glad bin laden is dead, glad it was our guys that got him, glad that
he knew it was coming, (as opposed to a missile strike), and glad justice
was finally served."
> 
> I hesitate to step into this particular fray, but in fairness, I don't
think Mike objected to bin Laden or celebrated his death because of his
*worldview*, per se.  (By "his" I mean "bin Laden's", natch.)
> -- 
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot