Re: Jonathan (or anyone) please help... Re: Hohner Echo Celeste note layout
"Jonathan E. Brickman" <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:43:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.equipment.harmonica.big-harmonica |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Jonathan: > > Thank you so much for your reply. However, I am confused! You wrote: > > "With solo (or scale) tuning, a player has full access to as many > complete octaves of notes that will fit in a given instrument." > > I don't understand. On the tuning chart that you sent (below) that > the notes are not in order. The difference between Richter and solo/scale is the collection of available notes. The order is unexpected, pair-inverted, on both. The pair-inversion is a characteristic of all tremolo harmonicas. Lots of people find that it makes no sense to them. It starts to make sense, only when you are playing the instrument. But remember: each hole is exactly one note, either draw, or blow, and not both. So if you consider every horizontal PAIR of holes as significant, you can ignore the pair-inversion, and the advantage will come out very quickly. The advantage is very simple: it is immensely easier to isolate one single note that you want, or especially one single chord that you want, on tremolo, than on ten/twelver. > How does all this make sense???? How do you have supposedly have all > this complete octaves when all the notes are mixed up?? > > I want to play hymns, folk songs; _full complete melodies_...but I > don't see how this is possible with the above mentioned questions. > > Jonathan, thanks again for your first reply, but I am really > confused!... I hope you can help me get this through my thick head!! > > Thanks again in advance. > > God bless, > > Paul Kunz The above is one of the reasons I wrote the "learning" page as I did, with a focus on intuition and a defocus on intellect :) Have you looked at it? It's here: http://joshuacorps.org/friends/thetremolo/learning.html -- Jonathan E. Brickman What good is freedom of speech and religion, without freedom to spank? http://joshuacorps.org