Re: Re: K5 distorted output from patches using Source-2
James Bong <jamesbong-yBeKhBN/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.equipment.kawai.k5 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
How much are they charging you for it? James --- narfman96 <narfman96-/[email protected]> wrote: > The balance only controls the volume for S1 and S2. > If S1 is all the > way down S2 is cranked. Other than the DDA envelope > (oh yeah the DHG > levels too) ahhh, where can S2 be turned down to > sublight. > > The aftertouch was easy. There's 2 pots on the > backside of the MI-004 > board they say Gain (VR1) and Offset (VR2) on them. > Open Midi-Ox and > watch the pressure change the values for aftertouch > from 00 to F7. > Adjust these pots to get the best performance for > your preferences. > Offset is where it starts to kick in. Then the gain > adjusts how > quickly F7 cranks in. I like a smooth contollable > range that doesn't > rip my tendons out.... That's why I can tell the > notes from G3 to D4 > in this K5 aren't as responsive as the rest. > > Whoohoo!!! I'm talking to Kawai about the Service > Manual. They are > soooo gooood in this day and age of crapping on us > hardware guys. > Oops did I say e-mu? Awww darn! Dirty bird!! I want > my money back!!! > > Anyway the manual should be on its way.... Fran > > --- In [email protected], James Bong > <jamesbong@...> wrote: > > > > How does it sound if you turn S1 all the way down, > and > > start turning up S2? Same distortion? > > > > Oh, and where was the after-touch adjustment? I'm > > always afraid I'm going to tip my stand over when > I'm > > using after touch modulation! > > > > James > > --- narfman96 <narfman96@...> wrote: > > > > > Yes I do have a scope I just haven't gotten that > far > > > yet. Yesterday I > > > rebuilt the keyboard. This synth has a nice > action > > > when it's all > > > greased up and triggers every note. I found the > > > aftertouch > > > adjustments and got it more sensitive than the > key > > > bending tipping > > > over the stand mode it was originally set for. > The > > > aftertouch strip > > > has a few spots that are less sensitive but hey > it's > > > a beast.... > > > > > > If it will help I can post the DAC's datasheet > here > > > in the files > > > section so you can see what weird output > > > configurations it can have. > > > Either current or voltage outputs can be used. > There > > > isn't any pot > > > for the offset zero. Also it seems like Kawai > > > doesn't use much of the > > > gain that's available. Maybe that's why it's so > > > noisy. > > > > > > The patches sound like they should if I turn the > > > balance so S2 is off > > > (-31). Except of course they're thin and > lifeless > > > without the other > > > voice mixed in. I saved a bank that way so I > could > > > check out the > > > keyboard. I can see where some of the noise > comes > > > from. The high > > > frequency response goes way out there. Most of > these > > > 80's and 90's > > > synths have low pass filters. This thing sounds > wide > > > open on top end! > > > Probably so you can hear the 128 harmonics in > all > > > their glory. > > > > > > Hopefully I won't be beat when I get home from > work > > > so I can play > > > around with this some more. Still haven't heard > from > > > Kawai yet about > > > the schematics. Also they always have me sign > their > > > non-disclosure > > > form so I'm leery about openly posting them in > the > > > group. Of course > > > helpful individuals are a different story. > Right??? > > > > > > Fran > > > > > > --- In [email protected], James Bong > > > <jamesbong@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You wouldn't happen to have an oscilloscope to > > > verify > > > > that the output of this chip is actual > problem, do > > > > you? > > > > > > > > If you do get the schematics, could you > possibly > > > get > > > > them scanned to share with the rest of us? > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > --- narfman96 <narfman96@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I resoldered everything involved in this > part of > > > the > > > > > circuit. There > > > > > is a feedback resistor on the DAC for the > audio > > > > > output. This measures > > > > > 6.8k same as the working one. Maybe tonight > I'll > > > try > > > > > lowering this > > > > > value to see if the gain decreases. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not having much luck finding a PCM55HP > DAC. > > > > > Digikey lists it for > > > > > $38.50 with a long, long lead time... Crap! > > > Anyone > > > > > know of a source? > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully Kawai gets back to me today about > the > > > > > schematic. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Fran > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], James Bong > > > > > <jamesbong@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this chip have a bias circuit to set > the > > > > > min/max > > > > > > output voltage scale? It could be > something as > > > > > simple > > > > > > as a cold solder joint finally loosing > contact > > > and > > > > > > changing the bias. I'd check/re-solder the > > > solder > > > > > > joints to everything connected to the > chip, > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > chip it's self. > > > > > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------