Re: Placing our Squeezeboxes in a separate IoT network?

rajdude <rajdude.apkgcn-NUepA2SMhDQqspMVqqL2D+4xXEVPTSb/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.equipment.slimdevices.general
Organization Logitech Squeezebox Forums
Message-ID <[email protected]>
OH ok. thanks for the info

In my setup right now, for the 3 network segments (VLANs), DHCP and DNS
services are provided by the Firewalla device. So I do not have to open
the ports for those services

As for internet access for IoT devices, the research I have been doing
is saying that it is acceptable for devices to have access to
internet...........hence the name - IoT (internet of things).

However, I am also concerned by the need of these devices to go out to
the internet so that I can control them from an app. I do understand
that by doing it that way, I can control them from anywhere in the
world. So I guess you lose some, but you gain some.

I also have Tuya devices here. When I setup my network segments I
thought they would NOT need internet access, only access to my phone
app. but no :-(


gordonb3 wrote: 
> Yep, it's quite a number of ports but remember this is all still LAN -
> on the internet side none of these are open (well, http is but not
> related to any of the squeezebox devices or services). Also note that
> the first three UDP ports for INPUT are for DHCP and DNS. You may need
> to rearrange those if you use  different machines for those services and
> LMS.
> 
> Regarding allowing internet access: I actually got some Tuya devices a
> while back. Bit of a mistake and I was thinking of converting them to
> Tasmota but an internet search learned that I would have to physically
> damage the devices more than would be safe to operate afterwards. I did
> however manage to create a local access method allowing me to control
> them without needing to go through some China based server and I figured
> I could block internet access from that point on. Guess what? If the
> devices are power cycled for one reason or another and possibly some
> other disturbances as well the local access doesn't function until the
> device has been able to `phone home`. That was/is... disappointing.
> 
> So yes I had to open that back up, but it won't stop me from evaluating
> whether future IoT devices coming into my home really need internet
> access to my benefit.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
rajdude's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=71085
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=116703
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.