Problem loosing web connection
Lee Carter <lee-JhviTq/[email protected]> Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:03:30 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.equipment.slimp3.dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D2D5E3ED91D6D5119AF000065B3847F9A4374B@DOUGAL> |
Hi Dean Just to let you know that since upgrading to the latest server/frimware release the problem I was experienceing with a lose of connection to the web interface has resolved itself. So whatever you changed in the new software (purposfully or not) seems to have done the job. It was not the Linksys router as I have not changed any settings on that. Cheers Lee -----Original Message----- From: dean blackketter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 17 February 2003 16:00 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [slimp3-dev] What features shall be handled by SLiMP3 and what features shouldn't? Hi Joachim, I couldn't agree more. I'm currently trying to focus the project on two things: 1. Music playing 2. Extensibility SLIMP3 is first and foremost a device for music playback and it's my job to make sure that it does this in an easy to use and powerful way. Adding in features that dilute this experience for our customers is something we need to avoid. That said, our customers have lots of great ideas for neat things to do with SLIMP3 and we should provide the tools to readily let them expand the feature set without affecting the core music capabilities. To this end, the new plug-in architecture, the command-line interface and the HTTP interface are ways to provide the tools for #2 without affecting #1. Sometimes it's hard to decide if a feature belongs in the SLIMP3 server itself or if it should be provided externally. If a feature is useful to a substantial subset of our customers and doesn't make the product harder to user or more confusing then generally I feel OK about putting it in the main source. Specifically about your password protection feature, I'd certainly consider it for inclusion in the main server if it didn't make it harder to set up and use, increased the security of the product and wasn't going to be a burden for us to maintain. -dean On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 01:05 AM, Joachim Dagerot <jd-92Y0kOk6C/[email protected]> wrote: > Is there anyone that have been thinking of where this project will > end, how it might look in a distance future? > > Everyday new lovely features are being checked in to the CVS. Like > small ants alot and alot of people drag there straw to the stack and > we now have a very competent, advanced and full featured server for > our SLiMP3 devices. > > But there is always more to be done, someone wants more X10 > integration, others want password protection... > > I'm not a perl developer but consider me as a experienced programmer > started with Turbo Pascal back in the early 90's and went the pascal- >> c++->java path where I'm standing right now. > > With that in my luggage I do have done som re-programming of the > SLiMP3 software, not very easy - new language and new architecture... > > What comes to my mind is that perhaps the SLiMP3 server project is > growing to very fast and might end up in a coloss, not manageable by > just a few. > > The software is distributed under the GNU license so it's free for > everyone to start a new dev-branch, but instead it might be of > interest to raise this issue and start a discussion on what feature > the SLIMP3 server itself should contain and what parts would be better > to leave to 3rd party software. > > In my mind right now I have the password protection of the web- pages, > that's for sure is a nice feature, but in my opinion that shouldn't be > taken care of by the SLIMP3 server, instead another web- server should > be fronting the user, one that can handle the user authorization by > regular passwd files, but also with some kind of directory through > LDAP or equal. > > Also I think it would be good to focus more on the API than on the > wizzle&bells part of the todo-list. The more nice-to-have-features > that gets into the code the harder it would be to port the software, > change architecture or document it. > > Just my 5 cents... > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! > http://us.click.yahoo.com/FpY02D/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/rIp0lB/TM > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [email protected] > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://www.chameleondirect.com http://www.thechameleongroup.co.uk ********************************************************************* This message is confidential; its contents do not constitute a commitment by The Chameleon Group except where provided for in a written agreement between you and The Chameleon Group. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of the message, please notify postmaster-JhviTq/[email protected] immediately. ********************************************************************* ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/FpY02D/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/rIp0lB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/