Re: DX7 Memory Corruption

"Bruce Wahler [email protected] [YamahaDX]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.equipment.yamaha-dx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm assuming a) that the leakage at 5V is less than at 50V; and b) the 
actual part received is not at the maximum point; other than that, all 
bets are off.  That said, I'd wager that the 1N4001's leakage is at 
least 10-20x that of a 1N4148, possibly more.  Also, if the 1N4001 
happens to leak say, 4.5uA at 5V, it would still pass its specifications 
-- probably won't be that bad, but a manufacturer would not consider the 
part 'defective.'

A 1N4001 is designed to be a rectifier diode; most of the time, I see 
them in power supplies.  The 1N4148 is designed as a fast signal-level 
switch, which is a closer match to this application.

Just my opinion.

Regards,

-BW

Bruce Wahler
Ashby Solutions.com™
[email protected]
http://music.ashbysolutions.com
http://halfmoon-switch.com
http://ashboys.com
978.597.7008

On 9/6/2018 5:40 PM, [email protected] [YamahaDX] wrote:
>
> Where are you getting the 2uA figure from, Bruce?
>
> The 1N4001-4009 series datasheet I've found only quotes 10uA at 
> maximum reverse voltage, but that's 50V for a 1N4001.
>
> Unfortunately, they don't give comparable figures, because they're 
> meant for different purposes.  If you look at the figures for them 
> getting hot, and near their reverse voltage limits, they're in the 
> same ball park.
>
> I couldn't find figures for the 1N4001 for a low reverse voltage.  
> It's probably a little bit higher than the 1N4148, but 2uA at 2-3V 
> doesn't seem right.
>
> - Andy
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.