RE: The end?

"Ben Thomas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.jane-siberry
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Beautifully put, all of you.
Thank you Siblings for allaying fears and comforting.  
I think you're right, it's a purge with purpose...perfect. 
Thank you again,
BenT

>>> Shawn Syms <[email protected]> 01/12/06 5:40 PM >>>
Troy: I hear you sweet pea, and agree. My anxiety was less that of a
cultural consumer and more just thinking about her well-being and
hoping
that she's not facing any kind of economic crisis or something else
dire. I
know that's ridiculously presumptuous and/or neurotic of me, but I
guess I'm
just a worrier -- and a big part of me feels "protective" of Jane and
doesn't want anything untoward to befall her.

My worries aside, I can see how these latest developments fall well
within
Jane's ongoing history of blazing her own trail. And as you remind us,
we do
have so much that Jane has given us already. I do hope those annual
concerts
continue, though!

xo,
S.




-----Original Message-----
From: TROY A ROEPKE [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 6:02 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: RE: The end?


I am not too concerned by this. While I would love to hear some new
Jane, I 
am perfectly content with the 25 yrs worth of Jane's original and 
non-original pieces of artistic glory we have now. If she never records

"lily" or whatever, we've still have 'Jane Siberry', 'No Border's
Here', 
'The Speckless Sky', 'The Walking', 'Bound by the Beauty', 'When I Was
a 
Boy', 'Maria', 'Teenager', 'Hush', 'City', 'The New York Trilogy, and 
'Sushan the Palace'. So, why do we need more? Of course, then, there is
the 
annual concerts which for me is always a highlight of the Fall.

Jane has given enough of her music and herself for me to be perfectly 
content.

Kisses,
Troy

>From: Shawn Syms <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 
>Subject: RE: The end?
>Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:29:35 -0500
>
>She also had a sale on the weekend in Toronto to get rid of all her
other
>possessions, though. I think that's part of why some of us have
reacted 
>with
>a bit of antsiness or concern...
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: January 12, 2006 12:17 PM
>To: [email protected]; [email protected] 
>Subject: Re: The end?
>
>I'm not worried at all about Jane.  I think she is a woman in
complete
>control.  Perhaps she just doesn't like that guitar anymore.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.